Ecuador vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates

Ecuador
0.0732 Persons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0761 Persons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
97th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
95th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0761 Persons per square kilometre against 0.0732 Persons per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0029 Persons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 97th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0424 Persons per square kilometre 0.0337 Persons per square kilometre 0.0087 Persons per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.055 Persons per square kilometre 0.0441 Persons per square kilometre 0.0109 Persons per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0649 Persons per square kilometre 0.0588 Persons per square kilometre 0.0061 Persons per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0721 Persons per square kilometre 0.0729 Persons per square kilometre 0.0008 Persons per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates, Ecuador or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0761 Persons per square kilometre against 0.0732 Persons per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates between Ecuador and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0029 Persons per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates?
Ecuador ranks 97th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-05-demographic-estimates-population-per-square/ecuador/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-05-demographic-estimates-population-per-square/ecuador/tanzania/">Ecuador vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population, per square kilometre
Unit
Persons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 5,582 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.