Ireland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates

Ireland
0.0734 Persons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0761 Persons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
96th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
95th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates over time

  • Ireland
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0761 Persons per square kilometre against 0.0734 Persons per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.0027 Persons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 96th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.052 Persons per square kilometre 0.0337 Persons per square kilometre 0.0184 Persons per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.0597 Persons per square kilometre 0.0441 Persons per square kilometre 0.0157 Persons per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.0678 Persons per square kilometre 0.0588 Persons per square kilometre 0.0091 Persons per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 0.0726 Persons per square kilometre 0.0729 Persons per square kilometre 0.0003 Persons per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates, Ireland or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0761 Persons per square kilometre against 0.0734 Persons per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates between Ireland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0027 Persons per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 05 - demographic estimates?
Ireland ranks 96th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-05-demographic-estimates-population-per-square/ireland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-05-demographic-estimates-population-per-square/ireland/tanzania/">Ireland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population, per square kilometre
Unit
Persons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 5,582 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates — Population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.