Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) vs Romania: Animal populations by NUTS 2 region

Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013)
2,510 Thousand heads (animals)
in 2016
Romania
1,813 Thousand heads (animals)
in 2025
Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) rank
10th
Romania rank
15th

Animal populations by NUTS 2 region over time

  • Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013)
  • Romania
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520102025

How they compare

Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) currently reports 2,510 Thousand heads (animals) against 1,813 Thousand heads (animals) in Romania, a difference of 697 Thousand heads (animals).

That makes Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013)'s figure about 1.4 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.

Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) ranks 10th and Romania ranks 15th of 405 regions.

Across the 3 decades both report, Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 2,566 Thousand heads (animals) 3,272 Thousand heads (animals) 706.3 Thousand heads (animals) Romania
2000s 2,457 Thousand heads (animals) 2,792 Thousand heads (animals) 335.49 Thousand heads (animals) Romania
2010s 2,396 Thousand heads (animals) 2,033 Thousand heads (animals) 362.36 Thousand heads (animals) Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal populations by nuts 2 region, Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) or Romania?
Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013), at 2,510 Thousand heads (animals) against 1,813 Thousand heads (animals) in Romania as of 2016.
What is the difference in animal populations by nuts 2 region between Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) and Romania?
697 Thousand heads (animals), with Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) and Romania?
21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2016.
How do Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) and Romania rank globally for animal populations by nuts 2 region?
Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) ranks 10th and Romania ranks 15th of 405 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Animal populations by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) vs Romania: Animal populations by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/animal-populations-by-nuts-2-region/border-midland-and-western-nuts-2013/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/animal-populations-by-nuts-2-region/border-midland-and-western-nuts-2013/romania/">Border, Midland and Western (NUTS 2013) vs Romania: Animal populations by NUTS 2 region</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal populations by NUTS 2 region
Unit
Thousand heads (animals)
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
452 places, 13,354 data points, 1977–2025
Last refreshed