Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Annual rate of change in urban populations
Costa Rica
0.7751
in 2020
New Zealand
0.7229
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
58th
New Zealand rank
60th
Annual rate of change in urban populations over time
- Costa Rica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.7751 against 0.7229 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0522.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1985 it was New Zealand ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 144 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.48 | 3.96 | 2.48 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.9433 | 2.2 | 1.26 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.3547 | 1.78 | 1.42 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.0725 | 0.7842 | 0.7116 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.7751 | 0.7229 | 0.0521 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual rate of change in urban populations, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
- Costa Rica, at 0.7751 against 0.7229 in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual rate of change in urban populations between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 0.0522, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for annual rate of change in urban populations?
- Costa Rica ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Annual rate of change in urban populations. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.