Chile vs New Zealand: Births per month annual
Chile
30.71
in 2019
New Zealand
29.85
in 2020
Chile rank
4th
New Zealand rank
6th
Births per month annual over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 30.71 against 29.85 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 40 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 50.54 | 44.57 | 5.97 | Chile |
| 1990s | 51.47 | 43 | 8.47 | Chile |
| 2000s | 41.95 | 39.17 | 2.77 | Chile |
| 2010s | 36.84 | 34.69 | 2.14 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher births per month annual, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 30.71 against 29.85 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in births per month annual between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.86, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2019.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for births per month annual?
- Chile ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Births per month annual. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.