Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1.45
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1.47
in 2023
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
176th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
173rd

Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
123456195019862023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1.47 against 1.45 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 176th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 236 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1950s 5.05 5.7 0.6449 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1960s 4.1 5.03 0.929 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 2.84 3.49 0.6414 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 2.53 2.74 0.2044 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 2.24 2.28 0.042 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.65 1.89 0.235 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 1.51 1.61 0.0968 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 1.53 1.48 0.0511 Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1.47 against 1.45 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2023.
What is the difference in effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.02, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 176th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to survive until childbearing age. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to. Statizoid, drawing on Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/effective-fertility-rate-children-per-woman-who-are-expected-to-survive-until/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/effective-fertility-rate-children-per-woman-who-are-expected-to-survive-until/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective fertility rate children per woman who are expected to survive until childbearing age
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
236 places, 18,723 data points, 1751–2023
Last refreshed