Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate

Rwanda
-1.43 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
-1.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda rank
148th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
146th

Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-4-202196119922024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports -1.41 % change on previous year against -1.43 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Rwanda ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 215 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s -0.1443 % change on previous year 0.6914 % change on previous year 0.8357 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s -0.056 % change on previous year 0.1281 % change on previous year 0.1841 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s -1.44 % change on previous year -1.1 % change on previous year 0.3366 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s -1.47 % change on previous year -0.9173 % change on previous year 0.5536 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s -2.49 % change on previous year -0.8791 % change on previous year 1.61 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s -1.64 % change on previous year -0.7733 % change on previous year 0.8671 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s -1.77 % change on previous year -1.37 % change on previous year 0.3946 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate, Rwanda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at -1.41 % change on previous year against -1.43 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate between Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.02 % change on previous year, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate?
Rwanda ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/fertility-vs-unmet-contraception-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/fertility-vs-unmet-contraception-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/tanzania/">Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 13,726 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fertility vs unmet contraception. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.