Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate

Sweden
-1.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
-1.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden rank
144th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
146th

Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate over time

  • Sweden
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-10-505196119922024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports -1.38 % change on previous year against -1.41 % change on previous year in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s -1.18 % change on previous year 0.6914 % change on previous year 1.87 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s -1.46 % change on previous year 0.1281 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 1.97 % change on previous year -1.1 % change on previous year 3.07 % change on previous year Sweden
1990s -2.8 % change on previous year -0.9173 % change on previous year 1.89 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 2.61 % change on previous year -0.8791 % change on previous year 3.49 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s -1.24 % change on previous year -0.7733 % change on previous year 0.464 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s -3.47 % change on previous year -1.37 % change on previous year 2.09 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate, Sweden or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Sweden, at -1.38 % change on previous year against -1.41 % change on previous year in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate between Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.03 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate?
Sweden ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/fertility-vs-unmet-contraception-annual-growth-rate/sweden/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/fertility-vs-unmet-contraception-annual-growth-rate/sweden/tanzania/">Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fertility vs unmet contraception, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 13,726 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fertility vs unmet contraception. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.