Aruba vs New Zealand: Fertility vs unmet contraception
Aruba
1.61
in 2024
New Zealand
1.57
in 2024
Aruba rank
136th
New Zealand rank
138th
Fertility vs unmet contraception over time
- Aruba
- New Zealand
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.61 against 1.57 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 136th and New Zealand ranks 138th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.86 | 3.75 | 0.1046 | Aruba |
| 1970s | 2.57 | 2.57 | 0.004 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 2.2 | 2 | 0.2066 | Aruba |
| 1990s | 2.22 | 2.01 | 0.2136 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 1.84 | 2.02 | 0.1794 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.85 | 1.94 | 0.0917 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.0072 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility vs unmet contraception, Aruba or New Zealand?
- Aruba, at 1.61 against 1.57 in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertility vs unmet contraception between Aruba and New Zealand?
- 0.04, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Zealand?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and New Zealand rank globally for fertility vs unmet contraception?
- Aruba ranks 136th and New Zealand ranks 138th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertility vs unmet contraception. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.