Australia vs Cambodia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Australia
213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia
205,811 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Cambodia rank
144th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Cambodia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 205,811 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 7,626 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 143rd and Cambodia ranks 144th of 207 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cambodia Difference Ahead
1970s 53,930 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 25,738 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 28,192 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 67,269 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 24,806 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 42,462 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 92,015 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 34,522 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 57,493 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 131,477 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 64,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 67,040 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 173,952 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 135,817 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 38,135 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 202,889 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 192,272 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 10,617 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Cambodia?
Australia, at 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 205,811 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Cambodia?
7,626 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cambodia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Australia and Cambodia rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Cambodia ranks 144th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cambodia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/cambodia/">Australia vs Cambodia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.