Australia vs Gambia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Australia
213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
194,032 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Gambia rank
146th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Gambia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 194,032 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 19,405 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 143rd and Gambia ranks 146th of 207 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 50,483 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 37,177 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 13,306 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 67,269 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 56,201 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 11,068 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 92,015 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 77,363 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 14,652 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 131,477 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 107,904 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 23,572 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 173,952 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 139,107 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 34,845 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 202,889 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 180,358 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 22,531 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Gambia?
Australia, at 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 194,032 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Gambia?
19,405 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Gambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Gambia rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Gambia ranks 146th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Gambia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/">Australia vs Gambia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.