Australia vs Iceland: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Australia
213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
231,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Iceland rank
140th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019962023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 231,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 17,927 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 143rd and Iceland ranks 140th of 207 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 50,483 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 51,151 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 667.8 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 67,269 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 78,510 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 11,242 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 92,015 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 95,417 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,401 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 131,477 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 142,054 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 10,578 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 173,952 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 175,929 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1,977 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 202,889 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 210,660 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 7,772 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 231,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 213,437 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Iceland?
17,927 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Iceland ranks 140th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.