Bhutan vs Tanzania: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Bhutan
71,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
79,661 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
174th
Tanzania rank
172nd

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 79,661 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 71,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 7,727 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.

Bhutan ranks 174th and Tanzania ranks 172nd of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 3,106 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 9,795 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 6,688 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 6,255 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 12,215 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 5,960 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 13,616 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 17,187 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,571 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 28,068 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 28,487 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 419.32 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 56,429 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 52,791 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,639 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 67,033 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 74,372 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 7,339 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 79,661 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 71,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Tanzania?
7,727 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tanzania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Tanzania rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 174th and Tanzania ranks 172nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Tanzania: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/">Bhutan vs Tanzania: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.