Bolivia vs Congo: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
36,463 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
30,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
188th
Congo rank
191st

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Congo
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 36,463 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 30,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 6,099 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 188th and Congo ranks 191st of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 9,502 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 7,317 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2,186 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 10,277 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 15,033 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 4,757 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 13,332 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 17,164 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,832 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 18,656 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 22,565 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,909 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 29,532 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 32,886 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,354 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 34,539 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 29,647 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 4,891 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Congo?
Bolivia, at 36,463 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 30,364 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Congo?
6,099 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Congo?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Congo rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 188th and Congo ranks 191st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Congo: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/">Bolivia vs Congo: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.