Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
403,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
114th
Chile rank
117th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Chile
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 403,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 26,009 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and Chile ranks 117th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 112,362 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 144,530 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 32,168 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 253,961 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 217,030 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 36,931 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 321,498 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 319,096 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2,402 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 383,442 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 363,139 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 20,304 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 403,934 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
26,009 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and Chile ranks 117th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.