Brazil vs Eswatini: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
234,631 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
138th
Eswatini rank
135th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 234,631 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 35,174 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 135th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 64,177 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 32,482 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 31,695 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 99,977 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 59,446 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 40,531 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 123,337 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 118,736 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 4,601 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 163,658 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 163,696 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 38.2 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 214,586 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 225,575 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 10,989 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 223,271 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 259,482 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 36,211 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 234,631 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Eswatini?
35,174 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 135th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Eswatini: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/">Brazil vs Eswatini: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.