Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
337,118 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
117th
Equatorial Guinea rank
119th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Equatorial Guinea
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019962023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 337,118 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 40,807 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 119th of 207 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 74,290 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 5,648 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 68,642 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 135,488 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 27,254 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 108,234 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 217,030 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 311,134 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 94,104 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 319,096 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 457,164 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 138,068 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 363,139 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 344,396 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 18,743 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
Chile, at 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 337,118 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
40,807 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 119th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.