Chile vs Uruguay: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
355,785 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
117th
Uruguay rank
118th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Uruguay
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197019962023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 355,785 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 22,140 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uruguay ahead.

Chile ranks 117th and Uruguay ranks 118th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 56,523 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 118,594 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 62,071 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 74,290 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 136,673 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 62,383 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 135,488 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 181,496 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 46,008 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 217,030 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 213,524 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3,506 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 319,096 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 321,495 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2,399 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 363,139 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 341,572 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 21,567 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Uruguay?
Chile, at 377,925 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 355,785 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Uruguay?
22,140 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 117th and Uruguay ranks 118th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uruguay: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/uruguay/">Chile vs Uruguay: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.