China vs Hungary: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

China
1.88 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
1.72 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Hungary rank
65th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Hungary
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197019962023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.88 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.72 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 153,260 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hungary ahead.

China ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 65th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Hungary Difference Ahead
1970s 32,358 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 720,721 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 688,363 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 72,993 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 972,209 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 899,216 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 189,648 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 906,242 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 716,594 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 487,104 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 718,827 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 1.17 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.38 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 205,486 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 1.74 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.67 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 72,555 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, China or Hungary?
China, at 1.88 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.72 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between China and Hungary?
153,260 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hungary?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do China and Hungary rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 65th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Hungary: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/china/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/china/hungary/">China vs Hungary: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.