Colombia vs Tunisia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
322,019 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
310,866 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
123rd
Tunisia rank
126th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019962023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 322,019 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 310,866 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 11,153 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 123rd and Tunisia ranks 126th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 59,230 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 57,078 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2,152 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 88,308 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 93,420 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 5,112 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 128,154 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 139,395 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 11,240 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 169,079 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 217,540 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 48,460 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 255,088 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 291,472 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 36,384 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 302,135 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 303,308 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1,173 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Tunisia?
Colombia, at 322,019 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 310,866 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Tunisia?
11,153 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tunisia rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 123rd and Tunisia ranks 126th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tunisia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/">Colombia vs Tunisia: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.