Ecuador vs Micronesia (country): GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
447,028 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Micronesia (country)
471,526 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
113th
Micronesia (country) rank
110th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Micronesia (country)
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197019962023

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 471,526 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 447,028 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 24,498 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Micronesia (country)'s figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 113th and Micronesia (country) ranks 110th of 207 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
1990s 175,516 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 413,974 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 238,458 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2000s 248,114 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 451,477 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 203,363 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2010s 377,666 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 455,459 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 77,793 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2020s 419,430 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 473,218 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 53,788 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Micronesia (country)?
Micronesia (country), at 471,526 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 447,028 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Micronesia (country)?
24,498 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Micronesia (country)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Micronesia (country) rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 113th and Micronesia (country) ranks 110th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Micronesia (country): GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/micronesia-fed-sts/">Ecuador vs Micronesia (country): GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.