Eswatini vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
235,408 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
135th
Nepal rank
137th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nepal
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 235,408 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 34,397 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Eswatini ranks 135th and Nepal ranks 137th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 32,482 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 32,547 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 64.79 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 59,446 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 45,132 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 14,314 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 118,736 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 72,921 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 45,815 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 163,696 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 109,968 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 53,728 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 225,575 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 168,667 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 56,908 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 259,482 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 223,302 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 36,180 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Nepal?
Eswatini, at 269,805 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 235,408 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Nepal?
34,397 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nepal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Nepal rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 135th and Nepal ranks 137th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/">Eswatini vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.