Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
2.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.32 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
57th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
58th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M200720152023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 2.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 2.32 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 16,480 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 58th of 207 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 1.52 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 884,244 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 632,232 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 1.79 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.13 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 660,794 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 2.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.88 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 345,285 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 2.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 2.32 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
16,480 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 58th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.