Finland vs New Zealand: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Finland
833,169 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
840,762 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
87th
New Zealand rank
86th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 840,762 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 833,169 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 7,593 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 207 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 308,916 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 260,414 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 48,502 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 430,028 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 313,031 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 116,997 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 516,932 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 379,190 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 137,742 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 722,898 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 531,375 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 191,523 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 788,649 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 670,505 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 118,145 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 830,548 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 809,395 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 21,153 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Finland or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 840,762 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 833,169 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Finland and New Zealand?
7,593 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.