France vs Nauru: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

France
4.96 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru
5.02 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
38th
Nauru rank
37th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • France
  • Nauru
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019962023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 5.02 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 4.96 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in France, a difference of 67,940 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nauru ahead.

France ranks 38th and Nauru ranks 37th of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Nauru Difference Ahead
1970s 1.99 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 14.28 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 12.28 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Nauru
1980s 2.58 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 11.72 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 9.13 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 3.25 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 5.63 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2.39 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 4.05 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 2.59 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.47 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre France
2010s 4.54 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 3.74 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 795,108 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre France
2020s 4.78 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 4.85 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 63,778 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, France or Nauru?
Nauru, at 5.02 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 4.96 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between France and Nauru?
67,940 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Nauru?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do France and Nauru rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
France ranks 38th and Nauru ranks 37th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Nauru: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/france/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/france/naoero/">France vs Nauru: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.