Hong Kong vs Macao: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
312.55 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
1.23 billion constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
4th
Macao rank
2nd

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Macao
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019962023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1.23 billion constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 312.55 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 913.46 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 3.9 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 4th and Macao ranks 2nd of 207 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Macao Difference Ahead
1980s 94.14 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 384.16 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 290.03 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 147.88 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 641.06 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 493.17 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2000s 205.17 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 816.11 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 610.94 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2010s 290.69 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.62 billion constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.33 billion constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2020s 306.27 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 876.20 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 569.93 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Macao?
Macao, at 1.23 billion constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 312.55 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Macao?
913.46 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Macao?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Macao rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 4th and Macao ranks 2nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Macao: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/">Hong Kong vs Macao: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.