India vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

India
1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
81st
Norway rank
78th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Norway
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 95,260 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times India's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

India ranks 81st and Norway ranks 78th of 207 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 76,591 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 355,278 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 278,688 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 116,215 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 513,111 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 396,896 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 198,045 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 690,014 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 491,969 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 361,305 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 914,530 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 553,225 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 696,533 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 354,837 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 972,840 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.16 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 190,538 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, India or Norway?
Norway, at 1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between India and Norway?
95,260 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Norway rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
India ranks 81st and Norway ranks 78th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/">India vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.