India vs Panama: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

India
1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
1.01 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
81st
Panama rank
83rd

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Panama
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M197019962023

How they compare

India currently reports 1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 84,210 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

India ranks 81st and Panama ranks 83rd of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Panama Difference Ahead
1970s 76,591 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 113,825 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 37,234 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 116,215 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 172,080 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 55,864 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 198,045 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 222,403 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 24,358 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 361,305 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 363,238 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1,932 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 696,533 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 726,881 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 30,348 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 972,840 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 885,739 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 87,101 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, India or Panama?
India, at 1.10 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between India and Panama?
84,210 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Panama?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Panama rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
India ranks 81st and Panama ranks 83rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Panama: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/india/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/india/panama/">India vs Panama: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.