Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
73rd
Sri Lanka rank
71st

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sri Lanka
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 9,690 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 73rd and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 871,219 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 183,556 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 687,663 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 824,407 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 294,938 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 529,469 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.14 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 459,773 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 679,128 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.28 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 732,578 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 547,839 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.32 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 12,803 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.48 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 151,480 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
9,690 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Sri Lanka rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 73rd and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/">Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.