Jamaica vs Sweden: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
73rd
Sweden rank
72nd

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sweden
400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M1.2M1.4M197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 8,700 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 72nd of 207 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 871,219 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 533,860 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 337,359 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 824,407 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 648,144 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 176,264 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.14 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 763,108 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 375,792 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.28 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.01 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 274,332 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.32 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 100,134 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 1.33 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.38 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 55,120 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1.41 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Sweden?
8,700 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Sweden rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 72nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sweden: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sweden/">Jamaica vs Sweden: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.