Malaysia vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Malaysia
1.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
76th
Norway rank
78th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malaysia
  • Norway
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M197019962023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 28,320 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Malaysia ranks 76th and Norway ranks 78th of 207 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 85,731 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 355,278 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 269,547 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 162,653 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 513,111 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 350,458 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 334,656 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 690,014 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 355,358 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 556,526 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 914,530 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 358,004 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 899,784 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 151,585 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 1.13 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.16 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 29,598 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Malaysia or Norway?
Malaysia, at 1.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 1.19 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Malaysia and Norway?
28,320 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Malaysia ranks 76th and Norway ranks 78th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/">Malaysia vs Norway: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.