Netherlands vs San Marino: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Netherlands
27.24 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
28.85 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Netherlands rank
10th
San Marino rank
9th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • San Marino
10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M30.0M35.0M197019962023

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 28.85 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 27.24 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 1.61 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was San Marino ahead.

Netherlands ranks 10th and San Marino ranks 9th of 207 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands San Marino Difference Ahead
1990s 17.56 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 22.53 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 4.97 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 20.63 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 28.79 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 8.16 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 23.24 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 24.46 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 1.22 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 25.84 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 26.35 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 507,667 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Netherlands or San Marino?
San Marino, at 28.85 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 27.24 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2022.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Netherlands and San Marino?
1.61 million constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and San Marino?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Netherlands and San Marino rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 10th and San Marino ranks 9th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs San Marino: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/san-marino/">Netherlands vs San Marino: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.