Oman vs South Africa: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre

Oman
290,623 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
299,490 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
132nd
South Africa rank
129th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Oman
  • South Africa
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019962023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 299,490 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 290,623 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 8,867 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 132nd and South Africa ranks 129th of 207 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 30,036 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 109,358 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 79,322 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 69,636 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 141,261 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 71,625 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 120,933 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 159,814 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 38,882 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 162,815 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 217,633 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 54,818 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 244,916 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 281,004 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 36,088 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 275,772 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 291,698 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre 15,926 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre, Oman or South Africa?
South Africa, at 299,490 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre against 290,623 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre between Oman and South Africa?
8,867 constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and South Africa?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Oman and South Africa rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per square kilometre?
Oman ranks 132nd and South Africa ranks 129th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs South Africa: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/south-africa/">Oman vs South Africa: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2010 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,607 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.