How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Monaco?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Monaco: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP

Chile

0.8752 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Monaco

0.8745 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chile rank

77th

Monaco rank

78th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Monaco

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.8752 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8745 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Monaco, a difference of 0.0007 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Monaco ahead.

Chile ranks 77th and Monaco ranks 78th of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Monaco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Monaco	Difference	Ahead
1970s	3.29 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	3.77 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.475 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Monaco
1980s	2.37 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.03 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.341 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
1990s	1.69 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.23 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.463 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
2000s	1.48 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.1 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3733 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
2010s	0.9082 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9128 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0046 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Monaco
2020s	0.8991 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9006 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0014 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp, Chile or Monaco?: Chile, at 0.8752 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8745 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Monaco as of 2024.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp between Chile and Monaco?: 0.0007 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Monaco?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chile and Monaco rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 77th and Monaco ranks 78th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Monaco: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/monaco/">Chile vs Monaco: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 10,036 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.