How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Nepal?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ireland vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP

Ireland

0.8083 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal

0.8079 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ireland rank

126th

Nepal rank

128th

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Ireland
Nepal

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.8083 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8079 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0.0004 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 126th and Nepal ranks 128th of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ireland	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	5.43 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	3.8 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.63 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1980s	2.57 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.4 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.167 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1990s	1.57 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.46 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8896 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2000s	1.13 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.98 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8595 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2010s	0.9473 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9869 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0396 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2020s	0.8867 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8351 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0516 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp, Ireland or Nepal?: Ireland, at 0.8083 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8079 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp between Ireland and Nepal?: 0.0004 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Nepal?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ireland and Nepal rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp?: Ireland ranks 126th and Nepal ranks 128th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/nepal/">Ireland vs Nepal: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 10,036 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.