How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP

Sudan

0.5906 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.5692 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sudan rank

200th

Zimbabwe rank

203rd

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Sudan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.5906 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5692 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0214 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 203rd of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	3.35 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.81 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5469 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Sudan
1980s	1.72 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.87 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1424 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1990s	2.33 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.48 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1485 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	1.74 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.47 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7323 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	1.22 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9077 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3155 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Sudan
2020s	1.12 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5707 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5528 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp, Sudan or Zimbabwe?: Sudan, at 0.5906 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5692 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp between Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 0.0214 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp?: Sudan ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 203rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 10,036 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.