How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Tuvalu?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tanzania vs Tuvalu: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP

Tanzania

0.9398 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Tuvalu

0.928 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Tanzania rank

39th

Tuvalu rank

41st

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Tanzania
Tuvalu

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.9398 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.928 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0118 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Tanzania ranks 39th and Tuvalu ranks 41st of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tanzania	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	1.73 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	3.74 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.01 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
1980s	1.07 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.73 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.66 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
1990s	1.87 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	2.11 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2413 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2000s	1.37 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.45 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0836 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2010s	0.9992 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8833 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1159 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2020s	0.9051 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8328 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0723 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP	Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp, Tanzania or Tuvalu?: Tanzania, at 0.9398 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.928 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp between Tanzania and Tuvalu?: 0.0118 constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Tuvalu?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Tuvalu rank globally for gdp at market prices (constant 2010 us$), per unit of gdp?: Tanzania ranks 39th and Tuvalu ranks 41st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Tuvalu: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/tanzania/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-at-market-prices-constant-2010-us-per-unit-of-gdp/tanzania/tuvalu/">Tanzania vs Tuvalu: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2010 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 10,036 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.