Thailand vs Trinidad and Tobago: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre

Thailand
35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
33.54 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand rank
75th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
77th

GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Thailand
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre against 33.54 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.60 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Thailand ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 210 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 601,421 current LCU per square kilometre 989,706 current LCU per square kilometre 388,285 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 2.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 7.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 14.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 26.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 32.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.64 million current LCU per square kilometre 235,925 current LCU per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre, Thailand or Trinidad and Tobago?
Thailand, at 35.14 million current LCU per square kilometre against 33.54 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre between Thailand and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.60 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Trinidad and Tobago?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Thailand and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Thailand ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Trinidad and Tobago: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/thailand/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/thailand/trinidad-and-tobago/">Thailand vs Trinidad and Tobago: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 9,868 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.