Belarus vs Central African Republic: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Belarus
429,376 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
462,720 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
156th
Central African Republic rank
153rd

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Central African Republic
0200.0k400.0k600.0k198020012023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 462,720 current LCU per square kilometre against 429,376 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 33,344 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 156th and Central African Republic ranks 153rd of 195 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 150,864 current LCU per square kilometre 150,864 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 16,311 current LCU per square kilometre 180,787 current LCU per square kilometre 164,476 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 154,702 current LCU per square kilometre 273,116 current LCU per square kilometre 118,414 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 346,503 current LCU per square kilometre 477,182 current LCU per square kilometre 130,679 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Belarus or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 462,720 current LCU per square kilometre against 429,376 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Belarus and Central African Republic?
33,344 current LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Central African Republic rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Belarus ranks 156th and Central African Republic ranks 153rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Central African Republic: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/central-african-republic/">Belarus vs Central African Republic: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.