Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Czechia
43.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
51.34 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
33rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
30th

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Equatorial Guinea
050.0M100.0M150.0M198020012023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 51.34 million current LCU per square kilometre against 43.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 7.97 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Czechia ranks 33rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 195 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 7.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.65 million current LCU per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 17.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.92 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 25.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 88.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 63.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 38.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 39.97 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.38 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Czechia or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 51.34 million current LCU per square kilometre against 43.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
7.97 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Czechia ranks 33rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/czechia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/czechia/equatorial-guinea/">Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.