Lebanon vs Macau, China: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Lebanon
29.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Lebanon rank
1st
Macau, China rank
4th

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Lebanon
  • Macau, China
010.0B20.0B30.0B198020012023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 29.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 26.90 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 9.9 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Macau, China ahead.

Lebanon ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 4th of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 3 and Macau, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre
1990s 566.27 million current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 566.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Lebanon
2000s 1.18 billion current LCU per square kilometre 862.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 315.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Lebanon
2010s 2.09 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.22 billion current LCU per square kilometre 129.74 million current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 4.49 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.80 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.69 billion current LCU per square kilometre Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Lebanon or Macau, China?
Lebanon, at 29.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Lebanon and Macau, China?
26.90 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Macau, China?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do Lebanon and Macau, China rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Lebanon ranks 1st and Macau, China ranks 4th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Macau, China: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/macao-sar-china/">Lebanon vs Macau, China: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.