Macau, China vs Viet Nam: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Macau, China
3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Viet Nam
6.18 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
4th
Viet Nam rank
3rd

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Macau, China
  • Viet Nam
02.0B4.0B6.0B198020012023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 6.18 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 3.17 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 2.1 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Macau, China ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre
1990s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 48.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 48.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Viet Nam
2000s 862.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 832.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.11 million current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 2.22 billion current LCU per square kilometre 3.64 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.42 billion current LCU per square kilometre Viet Nam
2020s 2.80 billion current LCU per square kilometre 5.50 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.70 billion current LCU per square kilometre Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Macau, China or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 6.18 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 3.02 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Macau, China and Viet Nam?
3.17 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Viet Nam?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do Macau, China and Viet Nam rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Macau, China ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Viet Nam: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/viet-nam/">Macau, China vs Viet Nam: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.