Mauritius vs Paraguay: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Mauritius
95.65 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
122.48 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
25th
Paraguay rank
22nd

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Paraguay
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M198020012023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 122.48 million current LCU per square kilometre against 95.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 26.83 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.

Mauritius ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Paraguay Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 854,037 current LCU per square kilometre 854,037 current LCU per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 9.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 398,543 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 23.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 50.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 27.87 million current LCU per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 81.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 105.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.85 million current LCU per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Mauritius or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 122.48 million current LCU per square kilometre against 95.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Mauritius and Paraguay?
26.83 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Paraguay?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Paraguay rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Mauritius ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Paraguay: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/paraguay/">Mauritius vs Paraguay: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.