Syrian Arab Republic vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Syrian Arab Republic
0 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27,080 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
192nd
Zimbabwe rank
189th

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Zimbabwe
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M198020012023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre against 0 current LCU per square kilometre in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 189th of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre
1990s 880,970 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 880,970 current LCU per square kilometre Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 2.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 0.2585 current LCU per square kilometre 2.31 million current LCU per square kilometre Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 435,389 current LCU per square kilometre 7.24 current LCU per square kilometre 435,382 current LCU per square kilometre Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 7,663 current LCU per square kilometre 7,663 current LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Syrian Arab Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre against 0 current LCU per square kilometre in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Syrian Arab Republic and Zimbabwe?
27,080 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 189th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/syrian-arab-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/syrian-arab-republic/zimbabwe/">Syrian Arab Republic vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.