Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square

Turks and Caicos Islands
0 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27,080 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
192nd
Zimbabwe rank
189th

General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k198020012023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre against 0 current LCU per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 189th of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre
1990s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre
2000s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2585 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2585 current LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 146,780 current LCU per square kilometre 7.24 current LCU per square kilometre 146,773 current LCU per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 236,880 current LCU per square kilometre 7,663 current LCU per square kilometre 229,218 current LCU per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 27,080 current LCU per square kilometre against 0 current LCU per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
27,080 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for general government total expenditure (current lcu), per square?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 189th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-total-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government total expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 8,090 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

General government total expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.