Barbados vs United Arab Emirates: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Barbados
30.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
26.78 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
79th
United Arab Emirates rank
80th

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • United Arab Emirates
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 30.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 26.78 million current LCU per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 3.23 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 80th of 206 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 2.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 745,208 current LCU per square kilometre 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 6.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 10.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 16.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.26 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 24.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 26.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Barbados or United Arab Emirates?
Barbados, at 30.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 26.78 million current LCU per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Barbados and United Arab Emirates?
3.23 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and United Arab Emirates?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Barbados and United Arab Emirates rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 80th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs United Arab Emirates: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/barbados/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/barbados/united-arab-emirates/">Barbados vs United Arab Emirates: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,446 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.