Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
69.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark
72.11 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
55th
Denmark rank
54th

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Denmark
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019962023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 72.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 69.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Denmark ranks 54th of 206 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Denmark Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 5.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 15.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 2,957 current LCU per square kilometre 25.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 2.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 39.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 36.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 17.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 52.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 34.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 52.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 68.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Denmark?
Denmark, at 72.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 69.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Denmark ranks 54th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/congo-dem-rep/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/congo-dem-rep/denmark/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,446 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.