French Polynesia vs Tanzania: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

French Polynesia
223.47 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
208.56 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
33rd
Tanzania rank
35th

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197019962023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 223.47 million current LCU per square kilometre against 208.56 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 14.91 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 35th of 206 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 14.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 50,092 current LCU per square kilometre 14.53 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 59.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 384,926 current LCU per square kilometre 59.16 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 124.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 119.24 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 175.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 146.54 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 182.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 100.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 81.52 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 203.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 187.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 16.11 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Tanzania?
French Polynesia, at 223.47 million current LCU per square kilometre against 208.56 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Tanzania?
14.91 million current LCU per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Tanzania?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Tanzania rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 35th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Tanzania: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/french-polynesia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/french-polynesia/tanzania/">French Polynesia vs Tanzania: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,446 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.