Nepal vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Nepal
37.88 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
34.20 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
70th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
73rd

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 37.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 34.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Nepal ranks 70th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 100,957 current LCU per square kilometre 933,720 current LCU per square kilometre 832,764 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 341,582 current LCU per square kilometre 3.27 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.93 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.00 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 4.27 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.65 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 16.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.00 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 32.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 930,800 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Nepal or Trinidad and Tobago?
Nepal, at 37.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 34.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Nepal and Trinidad and Tobago?
3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Trinidad and Tobago?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 70th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/nepal/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/nepal/trinidad-and-tobago/">Nepal vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,446 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.