Czechia vs Norway: International migration flows - Regions — Net international migration
International migration flows - Regions — Net international migration over time
- Czechia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 57,939 Persons against 36,845 Persons in Czechia, a difference of 21,094 Persons.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.6 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Norway ahead.
Czechia ranks 11th and Norway ranks 8th of 19 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,968 Persons | 25,683 Persons | 13,284 Persons | Czechia |
| 2010s | 21,041 Persons | 33,561 Persons | 12,520 Persons | Norway |
| 2020s | 135,546 Persons | 29,640 Persons | 105,906 Persons | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international migration flows - regions — net international migration, Czechia or Norway?
- Norway, at 57,939 Persons against 36,845 Persons in Czechia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in international migration flows - regions — net international migration between Czechia and Norway?
- 21,094 Persons, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Norway?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Czechia and Norway rank globally for international migration flows - regions — net international migration?
- Czechia ranks 11th and Norway ranks 8th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as International migration flows - Regions — Net international migration (inflows minus outflows). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on annual international population migration flows to and from sub-national regions, in large regions (TL2) and small regions (TL3). Data source Data is collected via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of data on small regions When demographic data are analysed along with economic data using the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting, see the list of OECD metropolitan regions (xlsx) and the EU methodology (link). Territorial typologies Small TL3 regions are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the demographic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.